CategoriesGST SBC

GST E-Invoicing in 2026: Do You Need to Comply at ₹5 Crore Turnover?

India Union Budget 2026-27

Home > Common GST Compliance Mistakes That Trigger Tax Notices in 2026

GST e-invoicing

When GST e-invoicing first rolled out in 2020, it only applied to businesses with turnover above INR 500 crore, a rule so narrow it barely touched anyone outside India’s largest corporates. That’s not the situation anymore. The threshold has been stepped down repeatedly since, and it now sits at INR 5 crore, low enough that a genuinely large share of mid-size Indian businesses are already in scope, whether or not they’ve actually checked.

This matters more than a compliance footnote. An invoice issued without a valid IRN isn’t just non-compliant on your side, it’s legally invalid, which means your buyer can’t claim input tax credit on it. That turns a missed e-invoicing obligation into someone else’s cash flow problem, and in our experience, that’s usually the moment it gets noticed and escalated often via the same kind of automated GST compliance mismatch that triggers a notice. Here’s exactly where the threshold stands right now, how it got here, and how to check whether your business is actually in scope.

What Is GST E-Invoicing?

A GST e-invoice isn’t just a digital copy of a regular invoice, it’s a business-to-business invoice that’s been reported to and validated by a government-authorized Invoice Registration Portal (IRP) before it’s issued to your customer. The IRP checks the invoice data, generates an Invoice Reference Number (IRN), and returns a digitally signed QR code that gets embedded on the final invoice. Only once that IRN exists is the invoice considered valid under GST law.

This is different from simply emailing a PDF invoice or generating one through accounting software, the validation step through the IRP is what makes it an “e-invoice” in the legal sense, not the file format.

The Current Threshold INR 5 Crore, and Here’s What That Actually Means

As things stand for FY 2026-27, e-invoicing is mandatory for any GST-registered business whose aggregate annual turnover (AATO) has exceeded INR 5 crore in any financial year going back to 2017-18. This threshold was set under Notification 10/2023-Central Tax and has been in force since 1 August 2023, it’s held steady since then, even as other GST rules around it have continued to shift.

“Aggregate turnover” here means the total value of sales across all GSTINs registered under the same PAN, including exports and exempt supplies, not just the turnover sitting in one branch or one state registration.

How the Threshold Has Fallen Since 2020
Effective Date Turnover Threshold
October 2020 Above INR 500 crore
January 2021 Above INR 100 crore
April 2021 Above INR 50 crore
April 2022 Above INR 20 crore
October 2022 Above INR 10 crore
August 2023 Above INR 5 crore (Current)

The direction here isn’t subtle. Every step down has pulled a wider band of ordinary mid-size businesses into scope, and CBIC’s own commentary has signaled the trend is toward covering more registered businesses over time, not fewer. If your business has been comfortably below past thresholds, that’s exactly the kind of assumption worth re-checking today rather than next year.

Once You Cross INR 5 Crore, You’re In Permanently

This is the detail that catches businesses off guard most often: the INR 5 crore check isn’t based on your current year’s turnover alone. If your aggregate turnover crossed INR 5 crore in any financial year since 2017-18, even a single year, even years ago, the e-invoicing obligation applies from the relevant notified date onward, and it doesn’t switch off if turnover later drops back below INR 5 crore.

In practice, this means a business that had one unusually large year a while back, followed by several quieter years since, can still be squarely in scope today. Checking only this year’s numbers and concluding you’re exempt is one of the more common and more costly mistakes we see.

The Extra Rule Above ₹10 Crore: The 30-Day IRN Window

Businesses with aggregate turnover of INR 10 crore or more face a tighter compliance layer on top of the base e-invoicing requirement. Since April 2025, invoices, credit notes, and debit notes older than 30 days from their invoice date can no longer be reported to the IRP for IRN generation at all, not delayed, simply blocked.

This is a genuinely easy rule to miss if invoice reporting isn’t built into a business’s regular monthly rhythm, since the consequence isn’t a penalty notice, it’s the invoice quietly becoming unable to be validated at all once the window closes.

Who’s Exempt, Regardless of Turnover

A handful of categories remain outside e-invoicing requirements even above INR 5 crore turnover:

  • Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units
  • Government Departments & Local Authorities
  • Insurance and banking companies
  • Goods Transport Agencies (GTAs)
  • Passenger transportation services
  • Cinema ticket sellers

Worth flagging: SEZ units are exempt, but SEZ developers are not, a distinction that trips up businesses operating within SEZ structures more often than it should.

How to Check If Your Business Is Actually in Scope

A proper check means looking at aggregate turnover across every GSTIN registered under your PAN, across every financial year since 2017-18, not just the most recent one. In practice:

  • Pull turnover figures for each financial year from 2017-18, combined across all your GSTINs
  • Check whether any single year crossed INR 5 crore, even if current turnover is lower
  • If you’re already above INR 10 crore, separately confirm your invoice reporting workflow respects the 30-day IRN window
  • Get this confirmed in writing as part of your GST advisory relationship, not assumed internally since tax notices on this point often surface well over a year after the fact, and a documented review is your clearest defence at that stage

Building this check into your regular filing rhythm is easier alongside our Compliance Calendar, which tracks this alongside your other statutory deadlines rather than as a separate, easy-to-forget task.

What Happens If You Don’t Comply

An invoice issued without a valid IRN when one was required isn’t a minor paperwork gap, it’s treated as not having been issued at all under GST law. That has two consequences that compound quickly: your own return reporting on the GSTN portal can be flagged as inconsistent, and your buyer loses the ability to claim input tax credit on that invoice. In practice, it’s often the buyer who notices first and escalates the issue back to you, since the missing ITC hits their numbers directly and if that escalation turns into an actual notice, our guide on how to respond to a GST notice in India walks through the reply format and timelines.

Where This Is Headed

Based on the pattern of the last five years, it would be reasonable to expect the threshold to be reviewed again rather than left permanently at INR 5 crore but no specific future figure has been officially announced, and speculating on one wouldn’t be useful. What’s more actionable right now is treating the current INR 5 crore line as a moving target worth re-checking periodically, rather than a one-time box to tick.

Key Takeaways
  • The current GST e-invoicing threshold is INR 5 crore aggregate turnover, in force since August 2023
  • Once crossed in any year since 2017-18, the obligation applies permanently, regardless of later turnover
  • Businesses above INR 10 crore face an additional 30-day IRN reporting window
  • Certain categories (SEZ units, insurance, banking, GTAs, passenger transport, cinema) remain exempt
  • An invoice without a valid IRN is treated as not issued at all, which blocks your buyer’s input tax credit

If you haven’t checked your aggregate turnover history against this threshold recently or if you’re already above INR 5 crore and want a second opinion on whether your invoicing workflow is fully compliant, that’s exactly the kind of review worth having before a mismatch surfaces on its own. Our GST Advisory Services in India cover exactly this kind of compliance check, alongside ongoing return filing and reconciliation support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does e-invoicing apply to B2C (business-to-consumer) sales?

A: No, the core e-invoicing mandate applies to B2B supplies and exports. B2C invoices follow separate rules, including dynamic QR code requirements for certain businesses, but not IRN generation.

Q: What happens if my turnover drops below INR 5 crore next year?

A: The obligation doesn’t switch off. Once your aggregate turnover has crossed INR 5 crore in any year since 2017-18, e-invoicing remains mandatory going forward, regardless of later fluctuations.

Q: Which Invoice Registration Portal (IRP) should I use?

A: Several government-authorised IRPs are available, including NIC’s portal and other authorised providers. Most businesses use whichever IRP their accounting software or ERP integrates with directly.

Q: Is a 6-digit HSN code mandatory for e-invoices?

A: Businesses above INR 5 crore turnover are required to use a minimum 6-digit HSN code at the item level; businesses at or below that threshold can use 4-digit codes.

Q: Does this affect my GST return filing directly?

A: Yes, indirectly a missing or invalid IRN can create inconsistencies between your e-invoice data and your GSTR-1 filing, which is exactly the kind of mismatch GSTN’s automated systems are now built to catch quickly.

Q: What if I’m not sure whether I’ve crossed the threshold in a past year?

A: This is worth a proper reconciliation rather than a guess, aggregate turnover has to be checked across every GSTIN under your PAN, across every year since 2017-18, which is easy to get wrong without a documented review.

×

Verify Email

Verify your email address below to download the PDF

Please wait while we verify your email.

CONTACT US

Name
=

RELATED POSTS

CategoriesGST SBC

Common GST Compliance Mistakes That Trigger Tax Notices in 2026

India Union Budget 2026-27

Home > Common GST Compliance Mistakes That Trigger Tax Notices in 2026

Common GST Compliance Mistakes That Trigger Tax Notices in 2026 (And How the AI-Matching System Catches Them)

GST compliance in India no longer depends on whether a tax officer happens to review your filings. The GSTN portal now crossmatches your GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-2B data against e-invoices, banking records and income tax filings in real time. A mistake that might have gone unnoticed for months a few years ago can now trigger a system-generated notice within days, requiring no human intervention. For businesses operating across multiple states or scaling quickly enough that manual reconciliation can’t keep pace, this shift changes what “staying compliant” actually means.

The good news is that most of the mistakes behind these notices are entirely avoidable once you know what to look for. In this guide, we’ll walk through the most common GST compliance errors we see businesses make, explain exactly how the automated matching system catches each one, and show you which notice type each mistake typically leads to so you can fix the gap before it becomes a compliance problem.

Why GST Mistakes Get Caught Faster Than Ever in 2026?

The GST system has moved from periodic manual scrutiny to continuous automated validation. Every return you file is checked against multiple data sources simultaneously: your outward supplies in GSTR-1 against the tax paid in GSTR-3B, your Input Tax Credit claims against your suppliers’ GSTR-2B filings, your e-invoice IRN data against your reported turnover, and increasingly, your GST records against your income tax and banking data.

In practice, this means the GSTN portal doesn’t need an officer to decide to investigate you. The moment a discrepancy crosses a threshold, the system flags it and can issue a notice automatically. This is exactly why understanding the mistakes below and fixing them at the source matters more in 2026 than it ever has before.

Nine (9) Common GST Compliance Mistakes That Trigger Notices

  1. GSTR-1 vs. GSTR-3B mismatches: Reporting different sales figures in your outward supply return (GSTR-1) than the tax you actually pay in GSTR-3B is one of the fastest ways to trigger scrutiny. This often happens innocently, a sales return recorded in your books one month but reflected in GSTR-1 the next but the system doesn’t distinguish intent from timing gaps.

Why it gets caught: the GSTN portal reconciles these two returns automatically every cycle.

Where it leads: this is the classic trigger for an ASMT-10 scrutiny notice, which requires a reply within approximately 15 to 30 days.

  1. Claiming ITC without reconciling GSTR-2B: Many businesses still claim Input Tax Credit based on their own purchase register rather than what appears in GSTR-2B. Following the introduction of the Invoice Management System (IMS) during the year 2024-2025, the acceptance, rejection or pending status of invoices and Credit Notes must be actively managed to streamline and generate your valid GSTR-2B. If your supplier delays uploading an invoice or enters your GSTIN incorrectly, that credit simply won’t reflect on your side, regardless of whether you genuinely paid the tax.

Why it gets caught: ITC claims are validated against supplier-side filings, not your internal records.

Where it leads: an automated demand for credit reversal, often with 18–24% interest depending on how the discrepancy is classified.

  1. Incorrect or outdated HSN/SAC codes: Since the GST 2.0 rate restructuring took effect from September 2025, most goods and services now fall under a simplified three-rate structure of 5%, 18%, or 40%. Businesses still using pre-restructuring codes or rates risk under- or over-charging tax without realizing it.

Why it gets caught: the system performs sectoral rate benchmarking using HSN-level data.

Where it leads: a demand notice for the tax shortfall plus interest, and in repeated cases, closer scrutiny of your entire invoicing pattern.

  1. Missing the e-invoicing threshold: E-invoicing thresholds have been progressively lowered, pulling many more MSMEs into the mandatory net than in previous years. Businesses that assume e-invoicing is only for large corporates often continue issuing traditional invoices without realizing they’ve crossed the applicable turnover limit.

Why it gets caught: non-compliant invoices are structurally rejected by buyers’ ITC systems, which surfaces the gap quickly.

Where it leads: invoices deemed invalid for credit purposes, plus compliance queries about the oversight itself.

  1. Delayed GST registration: Some businesses underestimate how quickly they cross the mandatory registration threshold, particularly when interstate supplies are involved. Assuming only local turnover counts is a common and costly miscalculation.

Why it gets caught: The GSTN now cross-references turnover data with income tax and banking records. Furthermore, with the deployment of the upgraded Aggregate Annual Turnover (AATO) functionality from 1st July 2026, the portal automatically updates AATO as subsequent returns are filed post-amendment window, making delayed registration and turnover mismatches highly visible.

Where it leads: retroactive tax liability and interest calculated from the date registration was due, not the date it was obtained.

  1. Ignoring Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) obligations: Certain transactions require the recipient, not the supplier, to pay GST directly. Businesses frequently overlook RCM liability on specific categories of purchases, assuming the supplier has already accounted for it.

Why it gets caught: unpaid RCM liability shows up as a gap between expected and reported tax payments.

Where it leads: interest on the unpaid amount and, in some cases, a formal notice questioning the omission.

  1. Inconsistent details across GST, Income Tax, and banking records: Turnover, address, or bank account details that don’t match across different government portals are a red flag the system is specifically designed to catch.

Why it gets caught: automated cross-referencing between GST, income tax, and banking data is now standard practice, not an exception.

Where it leads: in serious cases, this can be treated as suppression of turnover under Section 122 of the CGST Act, a much more serious position than a simple clerical error.

  1. Rushing or skipping annual return (GSTR-9) reconciliation: The annual return is often treated as a formality rather than a genuine reconciliation exercise. Discrepancies that were manageable at the monthly level can compound into a larger, harder-to-explain gap by year-end.

Why it gets caught: GSTR-9 data is checked against the full year’s monthly filings in aggregate, surfacing patterns that individual months might not reveal.

Where it leads: a notice questioning the full-year figures, which is typically more complex to resolve than a single-month discrepancy.

  1. Ignoring a notice or missing the reply deadline: Even businesses that make relatively minor mistakes can turn them into serious problems simply by not responding on time. GST notices come with strict windows often 7 to 30 days and missing one can trigger GSTIN suspension or a best-judgment assessment where the officer decides your liability without your input.

Why it gets caught: this isn’t a detection issue but an escalation one, the system automatically enforces deadlines. For a full breakdown of notice types, reply to forms, and timelines, see our complete guide to responding to a GST notice.

The 2026 Rule Changes Businesses Often Overlook

A few regulatory shifts from the past year deserve particular attention, since they change what “compliant” looks like:

  • GST 2.0 rate restructuring (effective September 2025): the shift to a simplified 5%/18%/40% slab structure means HSN/SAC accuracy matters more than ever, codes and rates that were correct before the restructuring may no longer be.
  • The three-year filing hard stops: if a return remains unfiled for more than 36 months, the GST portal permanently blocks it. This removes the option of “catching up later” that many businesses previously relied on.
  • Lower e-invoicing thresholds: turnover limits for mandatory e-invoicing have continued to drop, bringing a much wider band of MSMEs into scope, often without those businesses realizing the threshold has changed.

A Simple Monthly Checklist to Stay Ahead of GST Notices

  • Reconcile GSTR-2B before finalizing any ITC claim for the period
  • Cross-check GSTR-1 against GSTR-3B every single filing cycle, not just at year-end
  • Verify HSN/SAC codes and rates against the latest GST Council notifications
  • Confirm whether e-invoicing thresholds apply to you each financial year, not just once
  • Keep PAN, address, and turnover details consistent across the GST portal, income tax records, and banking details
  • Treat every notice as urgent — even a minor one — and respond well within the deadline

Why These Are Rarely Cases of Fraud — And Why That Still Matters

Most of the mistakes above don’t originate from an intent to evade tax. They come from disconnected systems, delayed reconciliation or simply not knowing a rule changed. We worked with a mid-sized manufacturing client who had been flagged for a GSTR-1/3B mismatch stretching back two quarters. On review, the gap traced entirely to a timing difference in how sales returns were being booked, not any attempt to understate liability. Because the discrepancy was caught and explained proactively, with clear reconciliation records, the matter was resolved without escalating into a formal demand.

That distinction—a genuine process gap versus a deliberate misstatement—matters enormously in determining how a case unfolds if it reaches the notice stage. However, the preferable position is to avoid having to make that argument in the first place.

When to Bring in a GST Advisory Team

Businesses with multi-state operations, high transaction volumes, cross-border supply chains, or a history of recurring notices tend to benefit most from a structured compliance review rather than reactive, notice-by-notice firefighting. A periodic health check such as  reconciling returns, verifying ITC eligibility,and confirming HSN and threshold accuracy is almost always less costly than responding to a notice after the fact.

Our GST Advisory and Corporate Compliance teams at Steadfast Business Consulting regularly help businesses build exactly this kind of proactive compliance framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the most common reason for a GST notice in India? Mismatches between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B are among the most frequent triggers, since the GSTN portal reconciles these two returns automatically every filing cycle.
  • Can a small mismatch in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B lead to a notice? Yes. Even minor timing differences, such as a sales return booked in a different month than it’s reported, can trigger an automated scrutiny notice under the current matching system.
  • What happens if I claim ITC not reflected in GSTR-2B? The credit is likely to be disallowed, and you may face a demand for reversal along with interest, since GSTR-2B is the primary document the system uses to validate eligible ITC.
  • Is e-invoicing mandatory for all businesses in 2026? Not for all businesses, but the applicable turnover threshold has been lowered progressively, so many mid-sized businesses that were previously exempt may now be required to comply.
  • What is the GST three-year filing block introduced in 2026? As of January 2026, any GST return left unfiled for more than 36 months is permanently blocked on the portal, removing the option to file it later.
  • How can I avoid GST notices proactively? Regular reconciliation of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, and GSTR-2B, accurate HSN/SAC classification, and consistent records across GST, income tax, and banking data are the most effective ways to reduce notice risk.

Key Takeaways: Avoiding GST Notices in 2026

Most GST notices don’t originate from fraud — they come from mismatches, missed thresholds, and reconciliation gaps that the GSTN’s automated system now catches almost immediately. Understanding which mistakes matter most, and fixing them at the source, is far more effective than responding to notices as they arrive.

If your business would benefit from a proactive GST compliance review, our advisory team at Steadfast Business Consulting can help you identify and close these gaps before they turn into a notice.

×

Verify Email

Verify your email address below to download the PDF

Please wait while we verify your email.

CONTACT US

Name
=

RELATED POSTS

CategoriesGST SBC

How to Respond to a GST Notice in India (2026 Guide): Section 74A, Timelines & Reply Format

India Union Budget 2026-27

Home > How to Respond to a GST Notice in India (2026 Guide): Section 74A, Timelines & Reply Format

How to Respond to a GST Notice in India (2026 Guide): Section 74A, Timelines & Reply Format

GST compliance in India has quietly become a data-matching exercise rather than a paperwork one. Between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, e-way bill records and ICEGATE export data, the GSTN / GST Portal systems now flag mismatches automatically, often before a human officer even looks at the file. For startups and SMEs juggling multiple compliance deadlines, and for larger businesses operating across states or borders, this means a GST notice can land even when nothing was intentionally wrong like a mismatched invoice, a delayed return, or an input tax credit claim that doesn’t quite reconcile is often enough to trigger one.

This is exactly why knowing how to respond to a GST notice has become a core business skill, rather than just a task for the tax team. In this guide, we’ll walk through the different types of GST notices you might receive, the newly consolidated Section 74A framework that now governs all notices from FY 2024-25 onward, the exact reply process on the GST portal, and the mistakes that turn a routine query into a prolonged dispute. By the end, you’ll know exactly what to do the moment a notice lands in your GST portal inbox.

What Is a GST Notice and Why You Received One

A GST notice is a formal communication from the GST Authorities asking a registered taxpayer to explain a discrepancy, provide additional documents or respond to an allegation of non-compliance. It is not, by itself, a finding of guilt it’s the authorities way of giving you a chance to clarify your position before any penalty or demand is finalized.

Notices are typically triggered by:

  • Return mismatches: differences between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and e-way bill data
  • Input Tax Credit (ITC) discrepancies: claiming more credit than supporting invoices justify
  • Late or non-filing of periodic returns
  • Export data mismatches: shipping bill details not reflected in GSTR-1
  • Registration-related issues: incomplete documentation or address verification during registration or amendment

Understanding why you received a notice is the first step to responding correctly, because each trigger maps to a different notice type and each notice type has its own form, deadline and reply format.

Types of GST Notices and Their Reply Forms

Different notices are issued under different provisions of the CGST Act, and each requires a specific reply form within a specific window. Here’s a quick-reference table:

Notice Received Reason Reply Form Typical Time Limit
REG-03
Additional documents needed during registration
REG-04
7 working days
REG-17
Show cause before registration cancellation
REG-18
7 working days
ASMT-10
Scrutiny discrepancy in returns
ASMT-11
As specified in notice (usually 15 – 30 days)
DRC-01 / DRC-01A
Show cause Notice/ pre-show-cause intimation
DRC-06
As specified in notice
Section 46 reminder
Non-filing of returns
File pending returns
15 days

Getting the reply form right matters as much as getting the content right, a well-drafted response filed on the wrong form can be treated as no response at all.

The Big 2026 Change: Section 74A Explained

If there’s one development every business owner should understand this year, it’s this: notices under the old Sections 73 and 74 can no longer be issued for FY 2024-25 and beyond. Both provisions have been consolidated into a single new provision, Section 74A, which now governs all GST demand notices going forward regardless of whether fraud is alleged or not.

Previously, Section 73 covered genuine short-payment or ITC errors (lower penalty exposure, up to 10%), while Section 74 covered cases involving fraud or wilful misstatement (penalty exposure up to 100%). Under Section 74A, both scenarios are addressed within the same section, but the facts of the case still determine which penalty band applies. This distinction matters enormously a notice alleging fraudulent intent without solid evidence can sometimes be successfully argued down to the lower penalty category, which is why correctly reading the allegation, not just the form, is critical.

The other meaningful change: the window to pay the demanded tax and interest at the reduced penalty rate has been extended from 30 days to 60 days, giving businesses more breathing room to settle straightforward cases before they escalate.

Section 73 vs Section 74 vs Section 74A at a glance:

  • Section 73 (pre-FY 2024-25): tax unpaid, short-paid, erroneously refunded, or ITC wrongly availed/utilised for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression
  • Section 74 (pre-FY 2024-25): short-payment or wrong ITC availment is by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax
  • Section 74A (FY 2024-25 onward): single provision, penalty band depends on facts, not the section number.

In practice, we’ve seen businesses receive a notice framed as a serious allegation when the underlying facts were closer to a genuine clerical mismatch. One SME client in the FMCG sector, for instance, received a notice alleging wilful ITC misstatement based purely on a timing gap between two return periods. On review, the discrepancy was traced to a genuine reconciliation lag rather than any intent to misstate, and the matter was resolved without escalation once the correct evidentiary position was presented. Getting an experienced GST advisor to assess which category truly applies before drafting any reply is often the single most consequential decision in the entire process.

Step-by-Step: How to Reply to a GST Notice on the Portal

Once you know what type of notice you’ve received, the actual filing process is fairly consistent:

  1. Log in to the GST portal and go to Services User Services View Notices and Orders.
  2. Download the original notice in PDF to confirm the exact section, form, and deadline.
  3. Identify the correct reply form based on the notice type (see the table above).
  4. Draft your reply point by point i.e., address every allegation raised; an unaddressed point can be treated as accepted.
  5. Attach all supporting documents you reference invoices, reconciliation statements, ledgers, or bank records.
  6. Submit using your Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) or Electronic Verification Code (EVC).
  7. Save the acknowledgement reference number — this is your proof of timely filing and should be retained indefinitely.

For notices from enforcement wings such as DGGI or the Anti-Evasion unit, a physical reply to the issuing office may be required in addition to the portal submission, always check the specific instructions on the notice itself.

Need a starting point? Our GST Advisory team can share a ready-reference reply format aligned to your specific notice type — get in touch and we’ll help you structure it correctly the first time.

What to Include in a Strong GST Notice Reply

The difference between a reply that closes a matter and one that invites a follow-up to notice usually comes down to a few habits:

  • Be factual, not emotional. Be factual and detailed. Explain the product or service in question, discuss the relevant Chapter Notes, and quote judicial precedents or HSN references.
  • Address every point raised. Go through the notice line by line; silence on any point can be read as agreement.
  • Attach everything you reference. An incomplete reply is often treated as no reply. Use Calculation Tables for valuation, tax calculations or GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B / ITC mismatches, summarize discrepancies in a clear table within the reply
  • Use Annexures. Keep the main response uncluttered by placing case laws, HSN schedules, or wide ITC tables in structured annexures
  • Avoid voluntary admissions. Don’t concede liability in your language unless you’ve independently verified the claim and intend to settle.
  • Maintain a reply log. Track every notice, response date, acknowledgement number and outcome, this record becomes invaluable during future assessments or audits.

Common Mistakes Businesses Make When Responding:

Even well-intentioned businesses tend to repeat the same errors:

  • Ignoring smaller notices, assuming they’ll be overlooked, they rarely are.
  • Filing a generic or partial reply instead of addressing each specific allegation.
  • Using the wrong reply form, which can invalidate an otherwise sound response.
  • Treating a Show Cause Notice casually, without recognizing it as a formal legal document with real consequences.
  • Not seeking expert review on Section 74A notices before replying, especially where fraud is alleged but the underlying facts suggest a genuine error.

What Happens If You Miss the Deadline or Ignore the Notice

Non-response doesn’t make a notice go away, it escalates it. Repeated non-compliance or failure to respond to intimations and Notices can lead to:

  • Best-judgment assessment for non-filers under Section 62 or unregistered persons under Section 63, which start with a non-obstante clause overriding Sections 73, 74, and 74A
  • Suspension or cancellation of GST registration
  • Blocking of e-way bill generation, disrupting the ability to move goods
  • Recovery proceedings under Section 79, including attachment of bank accounts
  • Prosecution under Section 132 in cases of wilful evasion

If a deadline is missed for a genuine reason, an application for restoration of proceedings or Adjournment request may be possible for certain notice types but this depends on the officer’s discretion and requires a well-documented justification, making early professional input valuable even after a deadline has slipped.

When You Need Professional Help

Some notices are straightforward enough to handle internally, a simple clarification query during registration, for instance. But once a notice involves a demand under Section 74A or a significant financial exposure, the framing of your reply can materially change the outcome. This is where an experienced GST advisory team adds real value, assessing whether the allegation is legally sound, identifying whether a case has been miscategorized, and ensuring the reply is built on a defensible factual and legal position rather than just procedural compliance.

At Steadfast Business Consulting, our GST Advisory and Legal Services teams regularly assist businesses in reviewing notices, assessing exposure, and drafting responses that hold up to scrutiny particularly where the newer Section 74A provisions are involved.

Key Takeaways: Responding to a GST Notice the Right Way 

A GST notice is manageable when you know what you’re looking at. Identify the notice type correctly, respond within the stipulated timeline, use the right reply form, and keep your response factual and well-documented. The introduction of Section 74A has changed how demand notices are framed and understanding where your case truly falls — a genuine error or a more serious allegation — can significantly affect the outcome.

If your business has received a GST notice, or you’d simply like a compliance health check before one arrives, our GST Advisory team at Steadfast Business Consulting is available to review your position and guide your response.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the time limit to reply to a GST notice? It depends on the notice type. Registration-related notices (REG-03, REG-17) typically require a reply within 7 working days, while scrutiny and demand notices (ASMT-10, DRC-01) usually specify 15–30 days. Always check the exact deadline stated on your notice.
  • What happens if I don’t reply to a GST show cause notice? The authorities can proceed to pass an order based on the allegations in the notice, which may include a tax demand, penalty, registration cancellation, or recovery action, all without your side of the case being considered.
  • What is the difference between Section 73, Section 74 and Section 74A? Section 73 and Section 74 were separate provisions for non-fraud and fraud cases respectively, applicable up to FY 2023-24. From FY 2024-25 onward, both have been merged into Section 74A, with the applicable penalty still depending on whether fraud or wilful misstatement is established.
  • Can I reply to a GST notice after the deadline? In some cases, a delayed reply or a restoration or Adjournment application may be accepted if there’s a valid reason, but this is at the officer’s discretion and is far less reliable than relying on time.
  • Which form is used to reply to a GST demand notice? Demand notices issued under DRC-01 or DRC-01A are typically replied to using Form DRC-06 on the GST portal.
  • Is a notice invalid if it wasn’t served through the GST portal? Not necessarily, the CGST Act recognizes several valid modes of service, including hand delivery, registered post, and in limited cases, public notice methods. The portal is simply the most common and convenient channel.
×

Verify Email

Verify your email address below to download the PDF

Please wait while we verify your email.

CONTACT US

Name
=

RELATED POSTS

CategoriesGST SBC

Year-end GST Checklist Steps to Smooth Transition

Year-end GST Checklist Steps to Smooth Transition

Home > Year-end GST Checklist Steps to Smooth Transition

Year-end GST Checklist Steps to Smooth Transition

As FY 2024-25 ends, ensure a seamless transition to FY 2025-26 with these essential GST tasks.

I. Outward Supplies: Get Your Records in Order

  • Reconcile GSTR 1 with GSTR 3B & GST Returns with Books of accounts and rectify any mismatches between books and filed returns.
  • Reconciliation of “E-Invoice and E-way bills” generated with actual sales
  • Check applicability of E-Invoice
  • From February 2025, reporting 6-digit HSN codes via dropdown is mandatory, as manual entry is disabled. The HSN master description will auto-fill the “Description as per HSN Code” field.
  • Ensure shipping bill details for the export of goods with payment of tax are correctly entered in GSTR-1 and transmitted to the ICEGATE portal for IGST refund claims.
  • Ensure all credit/debit notes are issued and reported in GSTR-1
  • Ensure tax liability against receipt of advances (services) and adjustment thereof to derive at unadjusted advances
  • Ensure correct bifurcation of B2B and B2C transactions in GSTR-1
  • In case of the export of goods/services without payment of tax, make sure to file application for LUT for FY 2025-26 on or before 31st March 2025.
  • Check tax compliance on branch/stock transfers
  • Ensure correct reporting of Taxable, Exempt, Non-GST and Nil-rated supplies
  • Verify if any corrections/amendments in invoices or details are required

II. Input Tax Credit (ITC) & RCM

1.Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) as per Books and GSTR 3B:

While filing GSTR-3B as per Circular 170 of CGST Act and claiming ITC recorded in books and matched with GSTR-2B, it is essential to verify any discrepancies at the year end, such as:

  • ITC matched with GSTR 2B but missed to claim in GSTR-3B
  • ITC reversed in Table of Permanent Reversal [4(B)(2)] instead of Temporary Reversal [4(B)(1)] in GSTR 3B
  • RCM ITC wrongly reported in Regular ITC
  • Interchange claims of SGST /CGST as IGST and vice versa, etc

Note: Any such correction/ claim shall be made up to the October month return filed by 30th November of the subsequent Financial Year or filing of annual return, whichever is earlier.

2. Other Important points to check under ITC are:

Other Important points to check under ITC

Note: Rule 37 – Check for ITC reversal required on account of non-payment to vendors within 180 days or reclaim of any ITC in respect of supplies for which payment has been made.

3. Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM):

Reconcile expenses attracting RCM with amounts reported in GSTR-3B and books.

Ensure GST is paid on RCM basis for imports of goods/services.

Claim eligible ITC in GSTR-3B by November 30th of the following financial year or before filing of the annual return, whichever is earlier.

Ensure correct reporting, payment and claiming of RCM in GSTR-3B.

III. Rule 96A Compliance (Exports under LUT/Bond)

1. Goods must be exported within 3 months from the invoice date.

2. Payment for export of services must be received in convertible foreign exchange/INR (as per RBI) within 1 year [or the period allowed under FEMA (9 months), including extensions] from the invoice date.

3. Regularly review compliance for each invoice; ensure no defaults before Financial Year ends.

4. Refund Timeline-

Refund applications must be filed within 2 years from the relevant date as per the act.

It may be noted that it is a regular activity to ensure that the refund is claimed periodically.

However, we shall check the same at the end of FY to plug any gap and apply for refund without any default.

IV. Other Compliances

  • If the conditions of Rule 86B are met, ensure that at least 1% of the total tax liability is paid in cash.
  • Obtain declarations from vendors exceeding the prescribed aggregate turnover threshold but exempt from e-invoicing under clause (s) of Rule 46.
  • Check for any GST TDS/TCS credit available on our GST Portal and claim the same after checking its authenticity from the books of accounts
  • Ensure registered persons with turnover up to ₹5 Cr opt in/out of the QRMP Scheme on time for seamless tax compliance
  • If opted for the Composition Scheme for FY 2025-26, ensure Form CMP-02 is filed by March 31, 2025.

Note:

1. Check whether the material sent for job work has been returned within the prescribed time limit (i.e. for Inputs – 1 year and for Capital goods – 3 years) and whether the same has been duly reported in ITC 04.

2. Ensure that goods sent on an approval basis are either returned within six months or sold with the issuance of a tax invoice to comply with regulations.

V. Credit Note Declaration Compliance

As per reference vide Circular No.-212/6/2024-GST-

Ensure that if the discount given by the supplier to a recipient through tax credit notes in a Financial Year exceeds ₹5,00,000/-, then the supplier must obtain a CA/CMA certificate from the recipient confirming ITC reversal.

If the discount given by the supplier to a recipient through tax credit notes in a Financial Year is up to ₹5,00,000, a self-declaration from the recipient is sufficient.

Note: To avoid a last-minute rush during assessments, it is advisable to maintain these documents for scrutiny, audit, or investigation.

VI. Input Service Distributor (ISD) Registration Requirement

(Effective from 01 April 2025)

Applicability

  • Any office of a supplier of goods or services or both that receives tax invoices for input services on behalf of distinct persons under Section 25.
  • It also includes invoices subject to reverse charge tax.

Mandatory Registration

  • Entities meeting the above criteria must register as an ISD under GST.
  • The ISD will distribute Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of such invoices to the respective recipients.

Action Required

  • Identify such offices/ entities on or before 31st March 2025.
  • Apply for ISD registration to comply with the new mandate.
  • This ensures proper ITC distribution and compliance with GST laws.

VII. The Hotel Industry!

Two major notifications were issued on 16th January 2025, impacting GST compliance for hotels and restaurants from 1st April 2025. Key changes as per notification no. are as follows-

Notification No. 05/2025 – CT (Rate)

Introduction of the “Specified Premises” concept (Hotels with high-value accommodations).

Removal of the “Declared Tariff” concept (Earlier tariff-based taxation is removed).

Mandatory Opt-In/Opt-Out Declaration before 31st March 2025.

Notification No. 08/2025 – CT (Rate)

E-Commerce Operators (like Swiggy, Zomato) will no longer be liable to pay GST on restaurant services provided in “Specified Premises”.

GST liability will now shift to restaurant owners, and they must pay 18% GST with Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefits.

Note-

What are “Specified Premises”?

1. Any hotel or restaurant where room rent exceeded ₹7500 per day in the previous financial year.

2. Any new hotel registering as a Specified Premises must file an Opt-In form (Annexure VII, VIII, IX).

Revised GST Rates from 1st April 2025

  • Standalone Restaurants (Not attached to any hotel) – 5% GST (No ITC)
  • Restaurants in Specified Premises (₹7500+ per day hotel rooms – 18% GST (ITC allowed)
  • Restaurants in hotels with room rent below ₹7500 per day – 5% GST (No ITC)

Important Notes:

  • Hotels falling under “Specified Premises” must file Opt-In Declaration (Annexure VII) before 31st March 2025.
  • New GST registrations must file Annexure VIII within 15 days of ARN generation.
  • For opting out, hotels/restaurants must file Annexure IX
  • Once an option is selected, it cannot be changed for the financial year unless an Opt-Out Declaration is filed.
CategoriesGST SBC

Indian Transfer Pricing Update: CBDT Amends Safe Harbour Rules

Indian Transfer Pricing Update: CBDT Amends Safe Harbour Rules

Home > Indian Transfer Pricing Update: CBDT Amends Safe Harbour Rules

SBC TP Update on CBDT Amendments to Indian Safe Harbour Rules-3 1 (1).pdf (1024 x 576 px)

Key Changes in Safe Harbour Rules as per the CBDT Notification

Executive Summary

 

SBC TP Update on the CBDT Amendments to Safe Harbour Rules vide Notification No. 21/2025 dated March 25, 2025.

  1. The definition of core auto components under Rule 10TA has been expanded to encompass lithium-ion batteries for use in electric and hybrid electric vehicles.
  2. The threshold limits under Rule 10TD for software development services, IT-enabled services (ITeS), Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO), Contract R&D in software development, and Contract R&D in generic pharmaceutical drugs have been increased from ₹200 crores to ₹300 crores.

The aforementioned amendments shall be applicable for the assessment years 2025-26 and 2026-27.

Summary of changes pre and post amendment

Before Amendment After Amendment
1. Definition of core auto components

As per Rule 10TA, Clause (b) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962

(i) engine and engine parts, including piston and piston rings, engine valves and parts cooling systems and parts and power train components;

(ii) transmission and steering parts, including gears, wheels, steering systems, axles and clutches;

(iii) suspension and braking parts, including brake and brake assemblies, brake linings, shock absorbers and leaf springs;
1. Definition of core auto components

As per Rule 10TA, Clause (b) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962

(i) engine and engine parts, including piston and piston rings, engine valves and parts cooling systems and parts and power train components;

(ii) transmission and steering parts, including gears, wheels, steering systems, axles and clutches;

(iii) suspension and braking parts, including brake and brake assemblies, brake linings, shock absorbers and leaf springs;

(iv) lithium-ion batteries for electric/hybrid vehicles.

Changes in Threshold Limits

Changes in Threshold Limits

India’s Transfer Pricing Safe Harbour Regime: An Overview

Overview of the Indian Safe Harbour Regime

The Indian Safe Harbour Regime was established in response to escalating instances of transfer pricing audits and disputes. Introduced under the Finance (No.2) Act of 2009, effective from April 1, 2009, this regime was introduced vide Section 92CB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Under section 92CB, the determination of an arm’s length price, as defined by section 92C or Section 92CA, is required to adhere to safe harbour rules. These rules provide predefined acceptable ranges of profits or prices, enhancing certainty for transactions.

To provide greater advantages to taxpayers, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) broadened the scope of Safe Harbour Rules through Rule 10TD of the Income-tax Rules. This expansion aims to streamline compliance procedures, encourage timely approvals, and reduce complexities associated with transfer pricing.

On March 25, 2025, CBDT issued a notification, extending the applicability of Safe Harbour Rules to the Assessment Year 2025-26 & 2026-27, which pertains to the Financial Year 2024-25 & FY 2025-26.

The Indian Safe Harbour Regime offers a structured and predictable framework that promotes compliance, minimizes disputes, and fosters a more harmonious business environment, ultimately contributing to a more efficient and effective transfer pricing ecosystem. 

Eligible Assessee

A person who has validly opted for safe harbour rules under Rule 10TE of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

Eligible Transactions

These eligible transactions qualify for safe harbour treatment under Rule 10TB, providing a simplified and predictable transfer pricing framework.

India's Transfer Pricing Safe Harbour Regime

The Rational Choice: Selecting the Safe Harbour Option

Advantages of Choosing the Safe Harbour Approach

 

Advantages of Choosing the Safe Harbour Approach
Enhanced Certainty
By providing advance insight into the acceptable range of profits or prices that meet Safe Harbour criteria, transactions gain a heightened level of certainty, offering stakeholders a clearer financial landscape.
Conflict Mitigation
Safe Harbour serves as an effective dispute avoidance mechanism, significantly curbing the potential for conflicts between taxpayers and revenue authorities. This fosters a more harmonious business environment, particularly significant given the high incidence of Indian Transfer Pricing litigation.
Streamlined Approvals & Assessment
Safe Harbour Rules offer a structured mechanism for application and approvals procedures, facilitating a smoother and time-bound process. This stands in stark contrast to the prolonged timelines associated with Domestic Litigation or Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs).
Comparative Compliance
In contrast to the complexities involved in Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and the Domestic Transfer Pricing Litigation Route, Safe Harbour Rules present a more favorable choice in terms of TP/ALP rates/margins, timelines, and associated costs. This streamlined approach can alleviate compliance burdens.
Resource Efficiency
The adoption of Safe Harbour Rules translates into substantial savings in terms of time, costs, and efforts, especially in potential litigation scenarios. This strategic choice can lead to optimized resource allocation and more efficient business operations.
Stakeholder Confidence
Safe Harbour instills confidence in taxpayers through its predictable framework, enhancing investor confidence and fostering robust business growth.
Safeguarding Reputational Capital
Choosing the Safe Harbour route mitigates the risk of reputational damage that could arise from contentious transfer pricing disputes. A clean record in compliance can enhance a company’s standing within its Group and among stakeholders.
Incentive for Voluntary Compliance
The transparent and predictable nature of Safe Harbour can incentivize voluntary compliance, enabling companies to proactively meet their transfer pricing obligations and contribute positively to the overall tax ecosystem.

Core Features of the Safe Harbour Rules in India

Safe Harbour Rules in India: Key Points for Taxpayers

For those seeking to opt for safe harbour rules for AY 2025-26 & 2026-27 and who have undertaken in eligible international transactions, adherence to specific guidelines is imperative. Here’s a concise breakdown of the crucial aspects:

Key Points for Taxpayers
Filing Requirement
Taxpayers opting for safe harbour need to file an income return and safe harbour application (Form No 3CEFA) to the Assessing Officer, both before the stipulated deadline i.e., 30 November 2025 for AY 2025-26 and 30 November 2026 for AY 2026-27.
Compliance Commitment
Even if opting for safe harbour, taxpayers must fulfill the prescribed transfer pricing documentation and maintain/Form 3CEB filing compliances (Rule 10TD(5) of the Rules).
Geographical Limitations
Safe harbour doesn’t apply to transactions with Associated Enterprises/Related Parties location in low or no tax countries.
Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP)
If approved, the transfer price by the tax authorities for an eligible international transaction bars the assessee from invoking the Mutual Agreement Procedure in a double taxation avoidance agreement with a foreign entity.
Adjustment Constraints
When opting for safe harbour, comparability adjustments and prescribed variation/range benefits (tolerance band) aren’t accessible (Rule 10TD(4) of the Rules).
Duration of Choice
The option exercised remains in effect for a period of one year.
Transaction Scope
Safe harbour applies solely to specified transactions, while TP scrutiny exposure remains open to other transactions not eligible under safe harbour.
Deemed Acceptance
If the Assessing Officer, Transfer Pricing Officer, or the Commissioner, as the case may be, does not make a reference or pass an order within the specified time, then the option for safe harbor exercised by the assessee shall be treated as valid.
Scope of definitions
The scope of Operating Revenue and Operating Expense to be used in the computation of the Operating Margin has been clearly defined in the Safe Harbour Rules.

Safe Harbour Rates

Safe Harbour Rates

Safe Harbour Procedure

Safe Harbour Procedure

How can SBC assist you?

Navigating the Safe Harbour Application process doesn’t have to be overwhelming. We’re here to provide discreet and effective assistance every step of the way.

SBC support:

We provide assistance in filing Form No. 3CEFA (Safe Harbour Application), ensuring a smooth process.

Our experts evaluate your eligibility for Safe Harbour Rules (SHR) by undertaking functional analysis and review of inter-company transactions and underlying agreements to guide your decision-making.

We conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis to help you assess your options effectively.

If needed, we calculate year-end transfer pricing adjustments to align with safe harbour rates.

Our support extends to year-end compliance, including Form No. 3CEB and transfer pricing documentation.

We offer representation support before tax authorities (AO & TPO) for safe harbour proceedings.

For TP assistance, reach us at +91 9553111131 /+91 9491933365.

CategoriesGST SBC

ISD – Imput Service Distributor Under GST

ISD - Imput Service Distributor Under GST

Home > ISD – Imput Service Distributor Under GST

ISD - Imput Service Distributor Under GST

Definition and purpose of Input Service Distributor

Definition

As per Section 2(61) of CGST Act, 2017, “Input Service Distributor (ISD)” means an office of the supplier of goods or services or both which receives tax invoices towards the receipt of input services, including invoices in respect of services liable to tax u/s 9(3) or 9(4), for or on behalf of distinct persons referred to in section 25, and liable to distribute the input tax credit in respect of such invoices in the manner provided in section 20.

Purpose of ISD

When a business entity has large share of common expenditure on services and the billing is made to a single location, the ITC available should not be wholly claimed by that centralised location as services are utilised by one or more distinct persons. So, it may take a separate registration as ISD to distribute the ITC to its distinct persons proportionately.

Background of ISD

Earlier, Taxpayers have an option to distribute common input services from third parties either through ISD or cross charge mechanisms.

But, Section 20(1) has been amended with effective from 1st April 2025 vide Notification No. 16/2024-CT dated 06.08.2024 making it mandatory to have registration under ISD for the entities having centralized offices where services are procured for or on behalf of distinct persons referred to in section 25.

Meaning of ISD and Cross Charge

1.Cross charge is a charge of tax on deemed supplies made by HO/centralized office to its distinct entities.

2.ISD is meant for distribution of common ITC on invoices received by HO/ centralized office among its distinct entities referred to in Section 25.

What are External and Internally Generated Services?

1.Common input services/ External services – Procuring input services (common to one or more distinct persons) from external/third party suppliers. (eg– audit services, legal services, Accounting software, Consultation services, Advertisement services, Bank charges, insurance, tele – communication services, Membership fee etc.)

2.Internally generated services – Activities performed by Head office as a whole benefitting its branches having separate GSTIN. (eg- Accounting services, IT services, CEO/CFO/CS/HR services)

Before 01st April 2025

After 01st April 2025

Any entity which has a centralized location receiving input services on behalf of its distinct persons is now required to obtain ISD registration. The Finance Bill removes the option previously available to taxpayers to choose between cross charge and ISD.

Note: Cross charge for internally generated services is not mandatory vide Circular 199/11/2023 – GST dated 17th July 2023. It clarified that in situations where no invoice is raised for ‘internally generated services’ the value can be deemed as NIL where the recipient is eligible to claim ITC.

Functions of ISD

Note:

ISD mechanism cannot be used for transfer of credit to holding company, subsidiary company, group entities, related parties as they have different PAN.

ISD can neither be a supplier nor recipient of goods/services.

Compliances by ISD

A. Forms/ Returns

Every taxable person registered as an ISD shall, for every calendar month or part thereof, furnish GSTR 6, as prescribed under Rule 65, a return, electronically, within thirteen days after the end of such month on the basis of details contained in FORM GSTR-6A.

Just like GSTR 2A, GSTR 6A is an auto-populated form based on GSTR 1 filed by the suppliers.

Eg: For the month of February 2025, the date of filing GSTR 6 shall be 13th March 2025

Late filing of GSTR-6 attracts a late fee of ₹100 per day u/s 47 of the CGST Act (₹50 per CGST & SGST each per day)

B. Documentation

1. Documents issued to ISD

Invoices issued by the supplier of services u/s 31 of CGST Act Debit Notes issued by supplier of services u/s 34 of CGST Act

Invoice issued as per Rule 54(1A)(a) to transfer ITC from regular registration located in the same state as ISD

2. Documents issued by ISD

ISD shall distribute the amount of tax credit to recipients by issuing an ISD invoice as per Rule 54(1).

Distribution of ITC (Rule 39)

A. Conditions/Restrictions for Distribution of ITC

ISD can be used only for transfer of ITC pertaining to Input Services including activities listed in Schedule II of CGST Act as deemed services.

Note : ISD cannot avail and distribute ITC on goods/capital goods

Amount of credit distributed should not exceed Amount of credit available.

ITC should be distributed on monthly basis, i.e., ITC available for distribution in a month should be distributed in the same month.

ISD shall distribute all the ITC received in GSTR 6A. Further, ISD should separately distribute eligible ITC and ineligible ITC. Reversal of Ineligible ITC shall be on part of the recipient.

The excess/wrongly distributed credit can be recovered as per Section 21 from the recipients of credit along with interest by initiating action under section 73 /74 or 74A.

B. Manner of Allocation of ITC

C. Manner of Distribution of ITC

Note: the term “turnover”, in relation to any registered person engaged in the supply of taxable goods as well as goods not taxable under this Act reduced by amount of any duty or tax levied under specific entries of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.

Therefore, Turnover includes all taxable supplies, Zero – rated Supplies, Exempt Supplies and Non – Taxable Supplies but excludes any duty or tax levied.

D. Pro – rata distribution of ITC

ITC to be distributed to one of the recipients is to be calculated by applying the following formula:

C1= (T1/ T) x C

R1 = one of the recipients, whether registered or not

C1 = ITC to be distributed to R1

C = Total ITC available for distribution

T1 = Turnover of R1 during the relevant period

T = Aggregate Turnover during the relevant period of all recipients to whom the input service is attributable the term “relevant period” shall be—

Scenario Relevant period
Recipients of the credit have turnover in their States/Union Territories in Preceding FY
Preceding Financial year
Some/all recipients of credit do not have any Turnover in their States/Union Territories in P receding FY
Last quarter for which details of such turnover of all the recipients are available, previous to the month during which credit is to be distributed

Eg : A company XYZ Ltd. has its Head Office (HO) in Maharashtra, registered as an ISD. The company has two branches in Maharashtra & Karnataka. The HO receives an invoice for input services (e.g., advertising services) with ITC of ₹1,00,000. The turnover of the branches during the relevant period is ₹5,00,000 & ₹10,00,000 of Maharashtra & Karnataka respectively.

Branch Turnover (₹) ITC Share ITC Type Distribution
Maharashtra (Same State)
₹5,00,000
(5,00,000/15,00,000) × ₹1,00,000 = ₹33,333
CGST ₹16,667 + SGST ₹16,667
Karnataka (Different State)
₹10,00,000
(10,00,000/15,00,000) × ₹1,00,000 = ₹66,667
IGST ₹66,667

Same State (Maharashtra): ITC is distributed as CGST & SGST. Different State (Karnataka): ITC is distributed as IGST.

E. Distribution of ITC by ISD on taxes paid under RCM

For the distribution of credit in respect of input services, attributable to one or more distinct persons, subject to RCM, a registered person, having the same PAN and State code as an Input Service Distributor, may issue an invoice or, as the case may be, a credit or debit note as per rule 54(1A) to transfer the credit of such common input services to ISD, and such credit shall be distributed by the said ISD to its recipients. (Notification 12/2024 – CT).

An ISD cannot pay taxes, it can only distribute the ITC to its recipients. Therefore, the following steps need to be followed:

Scenario:

An entity has its head office and ISD registration in Telangana. The head office receives legal services amounting to INR 1,00,000/- on 04th April 2025 on behalf of all its branches.

Step 1: Issuing Invoice to ISD

The head office issues an invoice to the ISD under Rule 54(1A) for transferring the ITC on 4th April 2025.

This invoice is reported in GSTR-1 for the period April 2025, so that it gets reflected in GSTR-6A of ISD.

Step 2: RCM Tax Payment

Since legal services are covered under RCM, the head office in Telangana ( as it has same PAN and is in same state as ISD) pays GST under RCM in GSTR 3B for the period April 2025.

This amount is to be reported in Table 3.1(d) of GSTR-3B.

Step 3: Claiming ITC on RCM

Since the head office has paid GST under RCM, it is eligible to claim the same as ITC under Table 4(A)(3) of GSTR-3B.

Step 4: ISD Distributes ITC

ISD receives ITC in GSTR-6A and distributes the ITC to different branches based on turnover in its GSTR 6 for the period April 2025.

F. What Happens if Distributed ITC Decreases Later?

ISD shall issue ISD credit note for reduction of credit in case where ITC which was already distributed gets reduced for any reason.

ITC on account of ISD-CN shall be reduced in same proportion in which the ITC was distributed on original invoice, and the amount so apportioned shall be-

a. reduced from the amount to be distributed in GSTR 6 in the month of Credit note

b. Where ITC to be reduced exceeds ITC to be distributed for a particular unit, difference shall be added to the output liability of the recipient unit

G. What steps to take if ITC is wrongly distributed?

ISD IMPLEMENTATION – ROADMAP

Identify & Categorize Expenses – Identify common expenses for ISD allocation from the list of all business expenses.

Identify distinct persons using common services – Identify distinct persons receiving common services among all the distinct persons referred to in Section 25

Assess ISD Registration Needs – Decide if common input services should be sourced for multiple units and obtain ISD registration.

Vendor Communication – Identify vendors providing common services and communicate with vendors to update the ISD registration details for raising invoices to ISD.

Manage GST on RCM Expenses

1.Identify common expenses under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM).

2.Route GST payments to the registered office in the ISD-registered state.

3.This registered office in same state as the ISD shall transfer the ITC related

to RCM to ISD for further distribution.

Compliances by ISD

1. Ensure invoices are raised to the recipients of the ISD for ITC distributed and distribute the ITC to the recipients of ISD as per Rule 39.

2. Ensure timely filing of GSTR-6 (ISD return). Compliances by Regular Registrations Ensure that regular registrations claim the eligible ITC and reverse the Ineligible ITC distributed by ISD.

CategoriesGST SBC

Key Rate Changes and Amendments Following the 55th GST Council Meeting

Key Rate Changes and Amendments Following the 55th GST Council Meeting

Home > Key Rate Changes and Amendments Following the 55th GST Council Meeting

Key Rate Changes and Amendments Following the 55th GST Council Meeting

1. Rate Decreased:

S No. Goods/Services Before (Rate/Condition) After (Rate/Condition)
1
Fortified Rice Kernels
18%
5%
2
Gene therapy to treat life-threatening diseases
Taxable
Exempted
3
Food items going into preparation for free distribution to weaker sections under a government program subject to the existing conditions.
As applicable
5%
4
Fresh or dried black pepper/dried raisins when supplied by agriculturist
5%
No liable to GST
5
Approved skill training partners of NSDC
18%
Exempted
6
Sub-systems of Long-Range Surface to Air Missile (LRSAM) and similar software
Taxable
Exempted

2. Rate Increased:

S No. Goods/Services Before (Rate/Condition) After (Rate/Condition)
1
ACC blocks (concrete) containing more than 50% fly ash content
5%
12%

3. Rates Clarified:

S No. Goods/Services Before (Rate/Condition) After (Rate/Condition)
1
Sale of used Electric Vehicles (EV) by and to individuals
As applicable
5%
2
Sale of used EV by businesses after refurbishment
12%
18% on their profit
3
Bank/NBFC penal charges for loan defaults
As applicable
Exempted

4. RCM Amendment related to Sponsorship Services-

 

Before Amendment:

Nature of service Supplier Recipient
Services provided by way of sponsorship to any body corporate or partnership firm.
Any person
Any body corporate or partnership firm located in the taxable territory.

After Amendment (w.e.f.16-01-2025):

Nature of service Supplier Recipient
Services provided by way of sponsorship to any body corporate or partnership firm.
Any person other than a body corporate
Any body corporate or partnership firm located in the taxable territory.
SBC Comments:

a. Corporates providing sponsorship services must now pay GST under the Forward Charge Mechanism (FCM), replacing the earlier Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM).

b. Corporates can avail full ITC without reversing 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐩𝐮𝐭 𝐓𝐚𝐱 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭 (ITC) under Section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.

5. Amendment related to

Composite Dealers-

 

Before Amendment:

Nature of service Supplier Recipient
Service by way of renting of any immovable property other than residential dwelling.
Any unregistered person
Any registered person

After Amendment (w.e.f.16-01-2025):

Nature of service Supplier Recipient
Service by way of renting of any immovable property other than residential dwelling.
Any unregistered person
Any registered person other than a person who has opted to pay tax under composition levy
SBC Comments:

a. Renting or leasing of immovable property by unregistered persons to composite dealers is now excluded from the scope of RCM.

b. Composite dealers benefit from 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐆𝐒𝐓 𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 and simplified reporting, promoting ease of doing business for smaller taxpayers.

CategoriesGST SBC

GST Update – 55th GST Council Meeting Recommendations

GST Update – 55th GST Council Meeting Recommendations

Home > GST Update – 55th GST Council Meeting Recommendations

GST Update – 55th GST Council Meeting Recommendations

The council meeting held on December 21, 2024, thoughtfully addressed the long-awaited concerns and hopes expressed by taxpayers

Recommendations with respect to Changes in rates

1. GOODS

1. Reduction of GST rate on Fortified Rice Kernel (FRK) to 5%

2. Reduction of compensation cess to 0.1% on supplies to merchant exporters at par with GST rate on such supplies

3. To extend the Concessional rate of 5% on food inputs used in making food for free distribution to economically weaker sections under government schemes

2. SERVICES

1. Restaurant Services:

The concept of ‘declared tariff’ is to be replaced with the ‘value of supply’ to determine tax rates:

𝟏 18% GST with ITC: If the value of supply exceeds ₹7,500 per unit

5% GST without ITC: If below ₹7,500.

Restaurants in hotels can choose between 5% GST (without ITC) or 18% GST (with ITC).

2. Increase of GST rate from 12% to 18% on the sale of all old and used vehicles, including EVs (except specified categories already taxed at 18%). GST is applicable only on suppliers’ margins (difference between purchase and selling price or depreciated value if claimed). However, it is not applicable to unregistered persons.

Recommendations with respect to Exemptions

1. GST on Gene Therapy to be exempted

2. To extend the IGST exemption to systems, sub-systems, equipment, parts, sub-parts, tools, test equipment, and software used for the assembly or manufacture of the LRSAM system.

3. To exempt from IGST imports of all equipment and consumable samples by the Inspection Team of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) subject to the specified condition

4. To exempt GST on contributions made by general insurance companies from third- party motor vehicle premiums to the Motor Vehicle Accident Fund.

Recommendations with respect to Exemptions

1. To exclude taxpayers registered under the composition levy scheme from the scope of Sr. No. 5AB of Notification No. 09/2024-CTR (dated 08.10.2024), which brought the renting of commercial/immovable property (excluding residential dwellings) by unregistered persons to registered persons under the reverse charge mechanism. Additionally, to regularize the period from the effective date of the notification (10.10.2024) until the issuance of the proposed notification on an “as-is-where-is” basis.

2. The supply of sponsorship services provided by body corporates is to be brought under the Forward Charge Mechanism.

Clarifications Recommended

1. Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) blocks with a fly ash content exceeding 50% are classified under HSN code 6815 and are subject to a 12% GST rate.

2. Pepper whether fresh green or dried pepper and raisins when supplied by an agriculturist is not liable to GST.

3. Proposed amendment to redefine “Pre-Packaged and Labelled” to include all retail commodities up to 25 kg or 25 litres, either pre-packed as per the Legal Metrology Act or labeled in compliance with its declaration requirements Clarifications On GST rates of “Ready to eat popcorn” which is mixed with salt and spices classifiable under HSN 21069099

  • If supplied as other than pre-packaged and labelled-5%
  • If supplied as pre-packaged and labelled-12%
  • However, when popcorn is mixed with sugar thereby changing its character to sugar confectionery (eg: Caramel Popcorn) it would be classifiable under HS 17049090 and attract 18%

4. Payment Aggregators regulated by the RBI are eligible for the exemption under entry at Sl. No. 34 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.2017, as they fall within the scope of the term ‘acquiring bank’ defined in the said entry. However, this exemption does not extend to payment gateways (PG) or other fintech services that do not involve the settlement of funds.

5. No GST is applicable on ‘penal charges’ levied and collected by banks and NBFCs from borrowers for non-compliance with loan terms.

Recommendations with respect to Exemptions

1. The supply of goods warehoused in Special Economic Zones (SEZ) or Free Trade Warehousing Zones (FTWZ) is treated as Neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services:

This applies when the goods are supplied to any person before clearance for:

Export or Domestic Tariff Area (DTA).

The provision aligns SEZ/FTWZ warehousing transactions with existing GST rules for Customs bonded warehouses.

2. Omission of Sections 12(4) and 13(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, and Rule 32(6) of the CGST Rules, 2017, to resolve existing ambiguities regarding vouchers.

Clarifications on Transactions Involving Vouchers:

Non-Supply Nature: Transactions in vouchers will neither be treated as a supply of goods nor as a supply of services.

Principal-to-Principal Basis: The distribution of vouchers on a principal-to-principal basis will not attract GST. However, for distribution on a principal-to-agent basis, GST will apply to the commission, fee, or other amounts charged by the agent.

Associated Services: Additional services like advertisement, marketing, co-branding, customization, and technological or customer support associated with vouchers will be subject to GST based on the charges for these services.

Unredeemed Vouchers (Breakage): Income recognized from unredeemed vouchers will not be treated as supply, and no GST will be levied on such breakage income.

3. No proportional reversal of ITC under Section 17(1) or Section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, is required to be made by the ECO for supplies on which they are required to pay tax under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.

4. Clarification regarding the availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, in the context of Ex-Works contracts:

o In an Ex-Works contract, goods are considered “received” by the recipient when:

Delivered to the recipient or transporter at the supplier’s premises.

Ownership transfers to the recipient at that point.

o This interpretation aligns with Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, enabling the recipient to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC).

o TC claims are subject to compliance with:

Sections 16 and 17 of the CGST Act.

All eligibility and procedural requirements.

o This clarification ensures smooth ITC claims in cases where ownership transfers at the supplier’s location.

5. Clarification on Late Fees on Delay filing of GSTR 9 and 9C

a. The GST Council recommended clarifying through a circular that the late fee under Section 47(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, is applicable for delays in filing the complete annual return under Section 44 of the CGST Act. This includes both:

FORM GSTR-9 (Annual Return)

FORM GSTR-9C (Reconciliation Statement) (where applicable).

All eligibility and procedural requirements.

b. Waiver of Excess Late Fees for Past Returns (FY 2017-18 to 2022-23):

The GST Council proposed issuing a notification under Section 128 of the CGST Act, 2017 to waive the excess amount of late fees for delayed filing of FORM GSTR-9.

The waiver is conditional:

The delayed FORM GSTR-9 for these years must be filed on or before March 31, 2024.

The related FORM GSTR-9C (if applicable) must also be filed within the same timeline.

3. No proportional reversal of ITC under Section 17(1) or Section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, is required to be made by the ECO for supplies on which they are required to pay tax under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Measures for Streamlining GST Compliance

1. Track and Trace Mechanism:

o A new provision (Section 148A) in the CGST Act, 2017 will enable the government to enforce a Track and Trace Mechanism for specified evasion-prone commodities.

o This system will use a Unique Identification Marking on goods or packages to trace them throughout the supply chain.

2. Clarification on Online Services:

For supplies of online services (e.g., online gaming, OIDAR) to unregistered recipients, the supplier must:

o Record the State name of the recipient on the tax invoice.

o Treat this State name as the recipient’s address under Section 12(2)(b) of IGST Act, 2017 and Rule 46(f) of CGST Rules, 2017.

Key Measures for GST Law and Procedure

1. Retrospective Amendment to Section 17(5)(d):

The phrase “plant or machinery” will be replaced with “plant and machinery” in the CGST Act, effective from July 1, 2017.

SBC Comments:

The amendment aligns the provision with the explanation of Section 17.

The Supreme Court, in Safari Retreat, highlighted two exceptions under Section 17(5)(d):

ITC eligibility for goods or services used to construct “plant or machinery.“

ITC eligibility for construction of immovable property not made on one’s own account.

While the amendment addresses the first exception, it leaves ambiguity around the second, potentially leading to further disputes.

The amendment to Section 17(5)(d) is anticipated but considered incomplete.

The second exception highlighted by the Supreme Court remains unresolved, leaving scope for litigation

2. Reduction of Pre-deposit for Penalty Appeals:

Pre-deposit for appeals under Section 129(3) reduced from 25% to 10%.Identical provision introduced under Section 112 for first appellate authority orders involving penalties under Section 129(3).

3. ISD Mechanism:

Include inter-state RCM transactions under ISD and amend related provisions (effective from 01.04.2025).

4. Temporary ID Numbers:

Introduce Rule 16A for generating temporary IDs for unregistered persons making payments under Rule 87(4).

5. Composition Levy Modification:

Allow taxpayers to update the “category of registered person” in FORM CMP-02 through FORM GST REG-14.

Key Measures for GST Law and Procedure

6. Amendment to Invoice Management System (IMS)

Key recommendations by the GST Council to strengthen IMS functionality under the CGST Act and Rules:

Amendment to Section 38 and Rule 60:

Legal framework for generating FORM GSTR-2B based on taxpayer actions in IMS.

Ensures consistency in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims.

Amendment to Section 34(2): Mandates ITC reversal by recipients for credit notes to enable suppliers to reduce output tax liability.

Insertion of Rule 67B: Standardized procedure for adjusting suppliers’ output tax liability against credit notes.

Amendment to Section 39(1) and Rule 61: Links FORM GSTR-3B filing to the availability of FORM GSTR-2B for reconciliation.

SBC Comments:

Enhances transparency, prevents fraudulent ITC claims, and ensures accurate tax compliance.

Effective implementation depends on GST portal readiness and taxpayer adaptability.

CategoriesGST SBC

Rule 86B: The Most Ignored but Important GST Provision You Need to Know

Rule 86B: The Most Ignored but Important GST Provision You Need to Know

Home > Rule 86B: The Most Ignored but Important GST Provision You Need to Know

SBC Rule 86B Alert

RULE 86B-Restrictions on use of amount available in electronic credit ledger In cases where –

₹50 Lakh Threshold

Applies if monthly taxable supplies (excluding exempt/zero-rated) exceed ₹50 lakh.

99% ITC Utilization Cap

Maximum 99% of output tax liability can be paid using the electronic credit ledger.

1% Cash Payment Mandate

At least 1% of tax liability must be paid in cash

Exceptions to the 99% ITC Utilization Restriction:

High-Income Tax-Payers

Applies if the person or key individuals (e.g., proprietor, MD, partners) paid over ₹1 lakh as income tax in each of the last two financial years.

Refund Recipients

Applies for those receiving refunds exceeding ₹1 lakh in the preceding year for unutilized ITC under clause (i) and (ii) of first proviso Section 54(3).

Excess Cash Payment

Registered persons who paid more than 1% of cumulative output tax liability through the electronic cash ledger during the financial year.

Specific Entities

Government departments, PSUs, local authorities, and statutory bodies are exempt.

CategoriesGST SBC

SBC_GST Annual Returns for the FY 23-24

SBC_GST Annual Returns for the FY 23-24

Home > SBC_GST Annual Returns for the FY 23-24

SBC_GST Annual Returns for the FY 23-24.pdf (1024 x 576 px)

Introduction-

As per Sec 44 of the CGST Act, 2017, Every registered person, other than specified persons shall

furnish an annual return (GSTR-9) and a self-certified reconciliation statement (GSTR-9C) annually

before 31st December of the following financial year.

Form Applicability
Annual Return (GSTR-9)
All GST-registered taxpayers must file GSTR 9. However, businesses with an annual turnover of up to Rs 2 crore are exempt from filing GSTR 9 and can opt not to file via Notification 14/2024 dated 10th July 2024.
Self-certified reconciliation (GSTR-9C)
Every registered person whose aggregate turnover during a financial year exceeds Rs.5 crore rupees must file this form as per Rule 80.

Due Date:The due date to file GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C for the FY 2023-24 is by 31st December 2024

Late Fees:

• GSTR-9: INR 200 per day of delay subject to a maximum cap at 0.50% of its turnover.

• GSTR 9C: No specific provisions are applicable for GSTR 9C, and hence the non-filing of GSTR-9

and GSTR 9C could be subject to a general penalty of INR 25,000.

SBC Assistance in filing GSTR 9 and GSTR 9C:

Assist in Sales and Purchase Reconciliation to ensure alignment between financial records and

GST returns.

Review Input Details to ensure no ineligible ITC is claimed

Check Valuation and GST Rates for sales to ensure compliance with GST provisions.

Verify Tax Payment on purchases under reverse charge mechanism (RCM).

Review the Place of Supply for inputs to ensure ITC is claimed under the correct

registration

Ensure Proper Accounting for amendments, adjustments, credit notes, and debit notes.

Review Sales Presentation to ensure proper classification based on the nature of supply.

Why accurate and timely filling is necessary?

Timely filing will help avoid late fees and penalties.

Accurate and proper disclosure will reduce the risk of receiving notices, penalties, interest,

and other legal consequences.

Even income missed reporting in GST returns can be identified and paid now which avoids any

future litigation of interest and penalties.

GSTR 9C reconciles financial statements with GST returns, correcting discrepancies and

ensuring ITC claims match actual purchases, thus preventing the risk of ineligible ITC claims,

reversals, and penalties.

Checklist for filing GSTR 9 and GSTR 9C:

S no Particulars
1
GST Login Credentials
2
Reconciliation of Outward Supply filed in GST Returns and Turnover in Books
3
Reconciliation of Input considered in GSTR-3B and amounts reflected in GSTR-2A
4
Reconciliation of ITC as per Purchase register Vs. Books
5
Sales and Purchase Register with HSN
6
Invoice-wise details of purchases with Description
7
Details of Advances Received and Advances adjusted
8
Details of Credit and Debit Notes
9
Adjustments pertaining to ITC of the previous year are considered in the Current year
10
Sales of the previous year are considered in the current year
11
Details of Capital Goods purchased whether ITC capitalized or not
12
Details of Capital Goods Sold along with sample Invoices
13
Sample Sales and Purchases Agreements
14
Any Refund claimed, sanctioned, rejected or pending during the FY
15
Sample Invoices of Sales and Purchases.
16
E-Invoices details
17
E-Way Bills details
18
Details of ITC reversed and reclaimed (if any)
19
Signed Audited financial statements for the financial year